Ari Melber

Share this post

Ban the oil, save the world?

arimelber.substack.com

Ban the oil, save the world?

On partial sanctions and Green hawks

Ari Melber
Mar 8, 2022
39
77
Share this post

Ban the oil, save the world?

arimelber.substack.com

Hi, Ari here… As we continue to track the unfolding war in Ukraine, my new piece for you digs into what policymakers and experts are considering regarding a far tougher move against Putin…


Going after everything but the oil…

As Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine grinds on, the U.S. and Western Europe are continuing a range of tough sanctions. You’ve probably seen some of the results, with headlines like:

Russia's ruble worth less than 1 cent after West tightens sanctions from CBS News, or The Russian Elite Can't Stand the Sanctions from The Atlantic.

So that is working, up to a point.

And yet, Russia’s greatest economic and geopolitical asset is oil. And it remains largely untouched.

A push to ban Russia’s oil started gaining more traction in the past few days. Speaker Pelosi came out for it. Then more lawmakers. President Biden said it’s on the table. 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at a press conference on March 3rd. Laurent Van der Stockt for Le Monde/Getty Images

And Ukraine’s president is telling foreign officials its the most vital economic move to support his country:

Twitter avatar for @SenDanSullivan
Sen. Dan Sullivan @SenDanSullivan
@ZelenskyyUa President @ZelenskyyUa said stopping the purchase of Russian oil and gas around the world would be one of the most powerful sanctions possible, “even more powerful than SWIFT.” #StandWithUkraine [2/7]
4:00 PM ∙ Mar 5, 2022
349Likes71Retweets

The West has not gone after Russia’s oil yet, for several reasons, including:

  • Driving up gas prices 

  • Exacerbating ongoing problems with the supply chain and inflation

  • Potentially isolating Putin and risking more repercussions 

  • Putting new pressure on other policy trade offs (oil sanctions against other countries; domestic drilling)

Many analysts emphasize that the main impediment is the high cost for countries that cut off oil. That’s why some European countries like Germany, which rely on Russia even more than the U.S., are ruling out this option right now. 

Green Hawks?

For the Ukrainian people, this is the most urgent emergency possible. For other countries, there is a short-term geostrategic balance between thwarting or punishing Russia, and not escalating into a wider war; and a longer-term goal to counter this more aggressive Russia on economic and foreign policy terms. 

The long-term is where renewable energy comes in. 

There are many, many good reasons to move away from fossil fuels (you probably know them and I won’t list them here). Some experts see this oil-related dilemma as a chance to lean more into renewable energy. Some of this is already playing out, here’s how economic publication Barron’s summarized it:

“…the current spike in oil prices could derail efforts to transition toward clean energy in the short-to-medium term, as officials look to secure supply chain-resilience, but speed it up in the long run.” 

Vladimir Putin on February 27, 2022. SERGEI GUNEYEV/SPUTNIK/AFP via Getty Images

Environmentalists tend to agree on the long term. Take renewable energy advocate Bill McKibben, who writes in his newsletter The Crucial Years:

“Russia’s power (besides nuclear weapons) is almost entirely based on.. gas and oil… 60% of its export earnings are hydrocarbons. For decades, Europe has cowered for fear Moscow would turn off the tap. But.. new technology… means Europeans can heat their homes with electricity instead of gas.”

Share

Specifically, he argues Biden can deploy the Defense Production Act to send clean energy heat pumps to Europe, just as the U.S. did with Lend-Lease, and defray much of the local cost of any Russian gas sanctions in Europe.

The Koch brothers.

A “choice point”

As for the longer term, in a new interview with me, McKibben lays out his larger argument for a renewable economy that actually reforms US foreign policy options and what he sees as domestic political hardball:

“If we move towards renewable energy fast, this is now the cheapest way to generate power on this planet. Sun, wind and the batteries to store them are now cheaper than coal and gas and oil… The principle extends beyond Putin—think of all the other autocrats that depend on oil and gas revenues to do what they do.

Why do we pay attention to the king of Saudi Arabia? 

Not because he’s got great ideas about policy. He just chops people’s heads off with a sword when he doesn’t like them. But he’s got too much oil.

Why did the Koch Brothers get to buy a political party, and use it to deform our democracy? 

Because they’re our biggest oil and gas barons. 

If we get off this stuff, the possibilities for the world are truly remarkable, and this feels like it may be one of the last real choice points we get on this journey… This is our chance to do a bunch of good things at once. 

And if we can’t bring ourselves to do this—while we’re watching the pictures of people demonstrating just incredible courage in Ukraine—then I don’t know if we’re ever going to.”

Vladimir Putin and Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia Mohammed bin Salman in 2017. c/o Reuters/Pavel Golovkin

These are significant goals to consider, as the world reckons with a nuclear Russia on offense in battle, as it maintains leverage over the fuel that still powers most economies.

Leave a comment

P.S. Before the war began, McKibben also joined me to discuss the rising demand for electric cars in America, and how that could also free up foreign policy options:

77
Share this post

Ban the oil, save the world?

arimelber.substack.com
77 Comments
Sylviane Ward
Mar 8, 2022Liked by Ari Melber

McKibben is proposing an end run, or a Hail Mary pass, and I think it’s bold as well as strategic. Business as usual hasn’t worked for us as Putin’s continuous aggressions push us and the free world into a nuclear corner. If the Biden administration and Congress could exhibit the courage,bravery, and leadership we see in the Ukrainians, step out of the box, do a 180, and swiftly execute an energy takeover, we might have a future without fear and despair always at our doorstep. These past 11 days have been horrifying- everyone feels it. I think whatever the economic sacrifices would be, we need to step up and fast. You’ve done a fantastic job covering this crisis Ari, keep the faith!!

Expand full comment
Reply
Joanie
Mar 8, 2022Liked by Ari Melber

The short term solutions are so complex. It is easy for some to say we are willing to pay higher prices at the pump if in the long run we are supporting Ukraine. But that may not be an option for some, especially those even more reliant on Russian oil in Europe. Not to mention how this may set off unstable Putin.

I loved your interview with McKibben. We need more of him in this world!! Reducing our reliance on fossil fuels is really the way to address the bigger issues long term (doesn’t answer the short term hell we are in now). I do think the world is moving in the right direction, but we have a long way to go. I can remember 10 years ago, my yoga teacher was reading articles about green energy from the WSJ in class, and people walked out. Today, many of them are driving Teslas. There continues to be such resistance to even contemplating green energy, especially in our big car, big oil country, but slowly slowly, people are waking up.

Great reporting on Ukraine all last week and tonight, Ari. Thank you!

Expand full comment
Reply
75 more comments…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Ari Melber
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing